Case 3204973/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Tony Murray v Rossi (Southend On Sea) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204973/2022
- Decision date
- 3 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Tony Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Tony Murray, had transferred to Rossi (Southend On Sea) Limited on 6 December 2021 following a business transfer. The tribunal accepted a pre-transfer schedule showing a gross weekly figure of £779, consistent with the claimant's evidence that he had previously been paid £600 net in cash. On that basis the tribunal calculated a gross daily rate of £155.80.
For the 25 days' holiday entitlement for 2021, the respondent had agreed to pay £2,988.50 but later treated the payments as gross and taxed them at source. The claimant said the agreement was for a net amount and complained immediately when the payments were taxed. The tribunal found no evidence to support the respondent's case that the agreement was for a gross sum. It calculated the gross value of the 25 days at £3,895 and found that £2,988.50 had already been paid, leaving £906.50 outstanding.
The tribunal also considered the claimant's 14 days' accrued holiday pay following the transfer, when he had been promoted to General Manager and paid £57,000 gross per annum. It found that the claimant was entitled to £3,069.22 gross for that entitlement, but had received £3,069.71 in total, so nothing further was owed on that issue. The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay £906.50 gross, or net with tax and NIC paid to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim succeeded in respect of the outstanding balance for the 2021 entitlement. The tribunal found the claimant had been paid £2,988.50 towards a gross entitlement of £3,895, leaving £906.50 unpaid. The separate 14-day holiday entitlement for 2022/2023 was found to have been paid in full and no further sum was awarded on that issue. | Upheld | — | £907 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £907
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.24 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.