Case 3204975/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Ragvinder Pahal v Brookfield Global Asset Management Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204975/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Ragvinder Pahal
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Ragvinder Pahal brought a claim against Brookfield Global Asset Management Limited. At a hearing on 4 April 2023, held by CVP before Employment Judge Isaacson, the Tribunal struck out the claimant's whole claim.
The sole reason given was jurisdictional. The Tribunal found that the claim had been presented out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. On that basis, the Tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claim. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claimant's whole claim as presented out of time and because the Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. It does not analyse this head separately. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claimant's whole claim as presented out of time and because the Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. It does not analyse this head separately. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the claimant's whole claim as presented out of time and because the Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. It does not analyse this head separately. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment strikes out the claimant's whole claim as presented out of time and because the Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. It does not analyse this head separately. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.