Case 3204979/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. L Gall v UK College of Business and Computing Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204979/2021
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B McKenna
- Panel members
- Mr L O'Callaghan, Ms G Forrest
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. L Gall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, recording that it was not well founded. No remedy was awarded on that claim.
The Equality Act 2010 claim was also dismissed, but on limitation grounds rather than after a merits finding. The tribunal held that the claim had not been presented within the three-month time limit in s.123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010, and it was not just and equitable to extend time under s.123(1)(b).
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Equality Act 2010 claim was dismissed because it was presented outside the three-month time limit in s.123(1)(a), and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time under s.123(1)(b). | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.