Case 3204980/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr AW MacDonald v Dough & Co Burger Amour Stortford — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204980/2022
- Decision date
- 27 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hook Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr AW MacDonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard on 27 February 2023 at East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Hook. The respondent did not attend, was not represented, and had not entered a response. The tribunal proceeded after the respondent had been warned under Rule 21 that judgment might be issued in its absence. The claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for holiday pay and awarded £390 gross. It also upheld the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages and awarded £279.50 gross. The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for notice pay, finding that it was not well founded.
The total sum payable to the claimant was £669.50 gross. The judgment records that the claimant confirmed he was not bringing a claim for unfair dismissal or any other head of claim within the jurisdiction of the Employment Tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded as gross holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £390 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as gross unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £280 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £670
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.