Case 3204981/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Begum v Lollyday Childcare and Education Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204981/2022
- Decision date
- 6 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Brien
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Begum
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs R Begum worked for Lollyday Childcare and Education Services Limited from 19 May 2019 to 31 August 2022 as deputy manager. The tribunal found that an underpayment in September 2021 was later corrected in October 2021, while the claimant remained in employment, so that issue was waived and did not amount to a breach capable of undermining trust and confidence.
After the claimant's father died on 21 January 2022, the staff handbook entitled her to up to one week's paid bereavement leave. The tribunal found she should have been paid for five full days but was paid for four, giving rise to a one-day shortfall of £80. The tribunal rejected the claim for 29 April 2022 because the documents showed she worked five hours, not six. It also rejected the June 2022 break-time claim because Ms Hussain told the claimant to take her break in the office, away from the children and not undertaking work, and the claimant chose not to do so.
For the week commencing 4 July 2022, the tribunal found the claimant was contractually due 32 hours but was paid for 26 hours after an agreed arrangement that she need not work on 7 July 2022. That created a further shortfall of £60. The tribunal held that these payment issues were not, either individually or together, calculated or likely to seriously damage trust and confidence, and the £60 shortfall was too insignificant to amount to a fundamental breach. The claimant had also continued in employment after the January shortfall and then resigned on 1 August 2022 giving four weeks' notice, so she had not been constructively dismissed.
The wages claim therefore succeeded only in part, with a total award of £140. No separate award was made for the dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal failed. The tribunal found the September 2021 underpayment was later remedied and waived, and that the January and July 2022 shortfalls were not fundamental breaches or conduct likely to destroy trust and confidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for damages for breach of contract, alternatively unauthorised deductions from wages, succeeded in part. The award comprised £80 for the January 2022 bereavement-pay shortfall and £60 for the July 2022 hours shortfall. | Upheld | — | £140 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £140
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
9 references- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v BCCI
- Woods v WM Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd
- Cockram v Air Products plc
- Vairea v Reed Business Information UK Ltd
- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- art 3 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.