Case 3204984/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Pembroke v Med Logistics Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204984/2021
- Decision date
- 22 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Pembroke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 22 August 2022, Employment Judge A Frazer heard the matter in the Claimant's absence. The Respondent was represented by Mr Q Somji, solicitor.
The judgment records that the Claimant's claims were struck out under Rules 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the Claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's orders and had not actively pursued the claim. The decision does not contain any findings on the substantive merits of the pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify this underlying cause of action; it records only that the Claimant's claims were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment does not set out the factual basis of the race discrimination claim; it records only that the Claimant's claims were struck out. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment does not discuss the merits of the unfair dismissal claim; it records only that the Claimant's claims were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rules 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.