Case 3205008/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Miss C Mead v Tyre Tech Mobile Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2023

Case reference: 3205008/2022
Decision date: 12 September 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Feeny Members
Venue: East London Hearing Centre
Panel members: Mr R Blanco, Mr S Woodhouse

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss C Mead

Respondent

Tyre Tech Mobile Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Miss C Mead appeared in person and the Respondent, Tyre Tech Mobile Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation), did not attend or take part in the hearing on 12 September 2023 before Employment Judge Feeny with Mr R Blanco and Mr S Woodhouse as members. The tribunal held that the complaint of harassment related to sex under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 was well-founded and ordered the Respondent to pay £10,000 for injury to feelings together with £900 interest.

The tribunal also found that the claim for unpaid annual leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded and ordered payment of £300 gross of deductions for tax and national insurance. In addition, it awarded £2,000 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars.

The unfair dismissal complaint under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was also found to be well-founded, but the remedy for that claim was not determined at this hearing and was listed to be dealt with at a further remedy hearing.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Sex discrimination	Complaint of harassment related to sex under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 was well-founded. The tribunal awarded £10,000 for injury to feelings and £900 interest.	Upheld	Sex	£10,900
Working time regulations	Claim for unpaid annual leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded. The tribunal ordered payment of £300 gross of deductions for tax and national insurance.	Upheld	—	£300
Other	The tribunal awarded £2,000 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.	Upheld	—	£2,000
Unfair dismissal	Complaint under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded, but remedy was reserved for a further remedy hearing.	Upheld	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £13,200; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.