Case 3205027/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hallas v Andrews Excavations Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3205027/2021
- Decision date
- 15 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hallas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at East London Hearing Centre on 15 December 2021 heard Mr M Hallas's claims against Andrews Excavations Limited. The judgment records that his claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was well-founded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay him £1,060 in respect of that claim.
The same judgment records that the claims for ordinary unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and holiday pay were dismissed upon withdrawal. No additional reasoning or separate remedy findings are set out for those withdrawn claims in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £1,060. | Upheld | — | £1,060 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the ordinary unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,060
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.