Case 3205027/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Judge v Carr’s Flour Mills Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205027/2022
- Decision date
- 19 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Judge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr P Judge, brought a claim for unfair dismissal against Carr’s Flour Mills Limited. The case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 18 and 19 May 2023 before Employment Judge Reid, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claim. It found that the claimant’s resignation on 4 August 2022 with immediate effect did not amount to a constructive dismissal, and therefore there was no dismissal within section 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which is required before an unfair dismissal claim can be brought.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant's resignation on 4 August 2022 with immediate effect did not amount to a constructive dismissal, so there was no dismissal for the purposes of s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.