Case 3205098/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Bernard Boyle v Leisure Employment Service Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3205098/2022
- Decision date
- 6 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr L O'Callaghan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Bernard Boyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre on 5 and 6 March 2024 before Employment Judge Gardiner and Mr L O'Callaghan, considered Mr Bernard Boyle's direct age discrimination complaints against Leisure Employment Service Limited. The only recorded substantive outcome in the written judgment is that the complaints were not well founded and were dismissed.
The written record does not set out the Tribunal's detailed reasoning. It states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The Tribunal dismissed the Claimant's direct age discrimination complaints. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.