Case 3205120/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Azokwu v London Borough of Newham — 2021
- Case reference
- 3205120/2021
- Decision date
- 10 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Azokwu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing and the respondent also did not attend. The tribunal considered the timeliness of the claims.
The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented in time and that it had been reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. That claim was dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the discrimination claim was not presented in time and that it was not just and equitable for it to proceed. The claims were dismissed in their entirety.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was dismissed because it was not presented in time and the tribunal found it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment refers to a claim of unlawful discrimination and the listing category identifies race discrimination. The claim was dismissed because it was not presented in time and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable that it should proceed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.