Case 3205186/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Gordon v Betfred Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205186/2022
- Decision date
- 4 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Gordon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an unless order dated 16 August 2023, the Tribunal required Miss R Gordon to send both the Tribunal and Betfred a disability impact statement and to answer questions relating to her disability discrimination complaint and her race discrimination complaint by 4.00pm on 13 September 2023. The order was not complied with.
Because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order, the claim was struck out. The judgment does not determine the merits of the disability or race discrimination complaints, and it records no remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal made an unless order on 16 August 2023 requiring the claimant to provide a disability impact statement and to answer questions relating to her disability discrimination complaint by 4.00pm on 13 September 2023. The claimant did not comply, and the claim was struck out. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The Tribunal made an unless order on 16 August 2023 requiring the claimant to answer questions relating to her race discrimination complaint by 4.00pm on 13 September 2023. The claimant did not comply, and the claim was struck out. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.