Case 3205200/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S. Bryan v Women Like Me International Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205200/2022
- Decision date
- 11 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S. Bryan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Massarella heard the case at East London on 11 April 2023 by CVP. Neither party attended, and the claimant was not represented. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had failed to take steps to pursue the case despite a strike-out warning, had not responded to the tribunal's letter of 27 February 2023 asking both parties to confirm readiness for the hearing, had not replied to the legal officer's letter of 14 March 2023 warning that the claim would be referred to a judge for possible strike out, and had not submitted documents required by the case management order of 6 December 2022.
The judge found that the claimant had failed actively to pursue the claim and that the failure to comply with tribunal orders was deliberate and contumelious. Having reminded herself of Rolls Royce plc v Riddle [2008] IRLR 873, the judge concluded that there was no basis to think the claimant would change her approach if the proceedings continued, that a fair trial was no longer possible, and that it was not proportionate to devote further tribunal resources to the case. The claim was therefore struck out under rule 37.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the case under rule 37 for failure actively to pursue it; the unfair dismissal complaint was not determined on its merits. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the case under rule 37 for failure actively to pursue it; the unlawful deduction claim was not determined on its merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37, schedule 1 of the ETs (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rolls Royce plc v Riddle [2008] IRLR 873
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.