Case 3205208/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Braithwaite v L & Q Living Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3205208/2022
- Decision date
- 30 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Braithwaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit of 25.00 pounds in respect of each of two allegations of direct discrimination because of religion or belief, following a preliminary hearing on 27 June 2023. The order was sent to the claimant on 6 July 2023.
The claimant did not pay the deposit. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of direct discrimination because of religion or belief under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment stated that the unfair dismissal and indirect discrimination because of religion or belief claims were unaffected.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment struck out the complaint of direct discrimination because of religion or belief after non-payment of a deposit order. It states that unfair dismissal and indirect religion or belief discrimination claims were unaffected by this judgment. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.