Case 3205222/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Johnson v Elizabeth Shaw and 4 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205222/2022
- Decision date
- 20 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Mr J Johnson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 20 July 2023 Employment Judge Massarella struck out the listed allegations because the claimant had failed to pay a £5 deposit in relation to each of the individual claims by 14 July 2023. The order recorded that allegation 3 was described as direct discrimination and victimisation, while allegations 4, 5, 6, 7, 10 and 11 were described as direct race discrimination and victimisation.
Allegations 12 and 13 were struck out only insofar as they related to withholding of pay. The judgment stated that the remaining claims would be determined by the tribunal at the final hearing. No merits findings or monetary award were recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Allegation 3, described as direct discrimination and victimisation, was struck out because the claimant did not pay the £5 deposit by 14 July 2023; the extracted text does not specify the protected characteristic. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Allegation 4, pleaded as direct race discrimination and victimisation, was struck out for non-payment of the £5 deposit by 14 July 2023. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Allegation 5, pleaded as direct race discrimination and victimisation, was struck out for non-payment of the £5 deposit by 14 July 2023. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Allegation 6, pleaded as direct race discrimination and victimisation, was struck out for non-payment of the £5 deposit by 14 July 2023. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Allegation 7, pleaded as direct race discrimination and victimisation, was struck out for non-payment of the £5 deposit by 14 July 2023. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Allegation 10, pleaded as direct race discrimination and victimisation, was struck out for non-payment of the £5 deposit by 14 July 2023. | Struck out |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.