Case 3205266/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Moss v TCH Housing Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205266/2022
- Decision date
- 11 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Moss
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the public video hearing on 29 March 2023. Employment Judge Moor found for Mrs G Moss on the pleaded employment claims against TCH Housing Limited, including unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, one week of accrued but untaken holiday, unlawful deduction from wages for 88 hours worked between 15 June 2022 and 11 July 2022, failure to provide written particulars, and failure to provide itemised payslips. The overall award was £3,397.75.
The appendix calculated the unfair dismissal award on a gross weekly pay of £250 and two complete years' service, giving a basic award of £750. The compensatory award was £559.75, made up of £400 for two weeks' net earnings and £159.75 for extra travel expenses. The wrongful dismissal claim carried a nil award because the two weeks' notice period was treated as covered by the compensatory award.
The unlawful deduction claim was calculated at £10 per hour for 88 hours, producing £888. The written-particulars failure was assessed at four weeks' gross pay, producing £1,000. Holiday pay was calculated by reference to 192 days of the holiday year elapsed to 11 July 2022, a 5.6-week annual entitlement, 2.95 weeks accrued, and 2 weeks already taken, leaving 1 week outstanding at £200. The extracted appendix does not show a separate monetary sum for the section 8 itemised-payslips finding.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £750 and compensatory award of £559.75, totalling £1,309.75. | Upheld | — | £1,310 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Nil award because the two weeks' notice period was treated as covered by the compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Holiday pay | One week of accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £200 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Calculated at £10 per hour for 88 hours worked between 15 June 2022 and 11 July 2022. | Upheld | — | £888 |
| Other | Failure to provide written particulars contrary to section 1 ERA 1996; the appendix records a section 38 award of four weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Other | Failure to provide itemised payslips contrary to section 8 ERA 1996; no separate amount is shown in the appendix. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,398
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £750
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £560
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.