Case 3205270/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3205270/2022
- Decision date
- 30 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Miss S Harwood, Mr M Rowe
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by Chelmsford City Council. It ordered a basic award of GBP 0.00 and a compensatory award equal to one month's net pay, with the amount to be agreed by the parties within 28 days or referred back to the tribunal on application.
The claimant's claim for direct age discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal ordered a basic award of GBP 0.00 and one month's net pay as a compensatory award, to be agreed by the parties or determined on application; no fixed monetary amount is stated. | Upheld | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The direct age discrimination claim under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.