Case 3205291/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms Sonia Sharma (2) Ms Esther Izundu (3) Mr Agni Singh v Competition and Markets Authority — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205291/2021
- Decision date
- 29 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Ms Sonia Sharma (2) Ms Esther Izundu (3) Mr Agni Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Fowell’s judgment of 29 July 2022 concerned complaints brought by Ms Sonia Sharma, Ms Esther Izundu and Mr Agni Singh against the Competition and Markets Authority. The tribunal recorded that case numbers 3205291/2021, 3205292/2021, 3205293/2021 and 3205723/2021 duplicated complaints 3205284/2021.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the complaints as an abuse of process. The judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying complaints and did not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment grouped complaints 3205291/2021, 3205292/2021, 3205293/2021 and 3205723/2021 together and struck them out as a duplication of complaint 3205284/2021, describing that as an abuse of process. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- abuse of process
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.