Case 3205406/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr P Wilson v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs — 2023

Case reference: 3205406/2022
Decision date: 11 June 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Howden-Evans Appearances

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Wilson

Respondent

Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal determined that the claimant's complaints of age discrimination and victimisation were res judicata. On that basis, those complaints were dismissed.

The claimant's complaint of disability discrimination, identified as failure to make reasonable adjustments, was not determined by this judgment and remained to be decided in the proceedings. No remedy or monetary award was addressed.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	The judgment states that the complaint of age discrimination is res judicata and is therefore dismissed.	Dismissed	Age	—
Victimisation	The judgment states that the complaint of victimisation is res judicata and is therefore dismissed. The protected characteristic linked to the victimisation complaint is not specified in the text.	Dismissed	—	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the complaint of disability discrimination, specifically failure to make reasonable adjustments, remains to be determined in these proceedings.	Other	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the .

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.