Case 3205407/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Miller v Abellio East Anglia Limited t/a Greater Anglia — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205407/2021
- Decision date
- 9 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Miller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr R Miller, had been ordered to pay a deposit of £500.00 following a preliminary hearing on 11 February 2022. The order was sent to him on 16 February 2022, but he failed to pay the deposit.
Because the deposit was not paid, the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The reasons do not record any determination of the substantive merits of the claim.
The tribunal also noted that the hearing listed for 11 and 12 August 2022 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded claims in the reasons; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out because the claimant failed to pay a £500 deposit ordered after a preliminary hearing on 11 February 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.