Case 3205446/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Didellot-Khelifi v Dalston Eastern Curve Garden Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205446/2022
- Decision date
- 31 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Travers Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Travers on 31 March 2023. The tribunal considered whether the claim had been presented outside the time limits in sections 123(1)(a) and (b) and, if so, whether it should be allowed to proceed out of time.
The tribunal found that the primary time limit expired on 17 August 2022 and that the claim was received on 25 October 2022. It therefore held that the claim was out of time and that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it.
The tribunal also considered whether it would be just and equitable to extend time, but decided that it would not. In consequence, the claim was dismissed. The reasons record that the respondent’s title was amended to Dalston Eastern Curve Garden Ltd.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action; it only determines that the claim was presented out of time and is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 123(1)(a) and (b)
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.