Case 3205473/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Seaman v Hanover Harwich (Trading) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205473/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Seaman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video platform before Employment Judge Taylor on 22 March 2023, held that the claimant's contract of employment had ended by operation of law following a frustrating event on 16 June 2022. On that basis, the claimant's claim for notice pay on the ending of her employment was dismissed.
The judgment also records that, by consent, the respondent was to pay the claimant a gross/net sum of £676.71 in respect of holiday pay due up to 16 June 2022. The text does not set out any further contested findings or any apportionment of the sum between different heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay on the ending of employment was dismissed after the tribunal held that the contract ended by operation of law following a frustrating event on 16 June 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a gross/net sum of £676.71 in respect of holiday pay due up to 16 June 2022. | Settled | — | £677 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £677
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.