Case 3205536/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Bartlett v WWCG Investments LLP and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205536/2022
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs S Bartlett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 21 July 2023, Acting Regional Employment Judge Burgher entered a Rule 21 default judgment against the first respondent, WWCG Investments LLP. The judgment states that the first respondent was liable and that it must pay Mrs S Bartlett £25,000.00.
The judgment further states that the claims against Matthew Paul Lee and Sow Sun Thong were dismissed because they were not employers. No further detail about the substantive pleaded claims appears in the extracted text, and the hearing listed for 3 October 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 default judgment on liability was entered against the first respondent, WWCG Investments LLP, but the extracted text does not identify the underlying pleaded claim types. The judgment also dismisses the claims against the second and third respondents because they were found not to be employers. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.