Case 3205565/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Derek Noonan v F. Kelleher Plant Hire Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205565/2021
- Decision date
- 14 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Garsed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Derek Noonan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the telephone hearing on 10 March 2022 before Employment Judge Garsed, the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was conceded and dismissed. The tribunal then found the Working Time Regulations 1998 claim for unpaid holiday pay to be well founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £6,085.80 gross for unpaid holiday pay, subject to the appropriate and necessary deductions. It also recorded an admitted failure to provide written particulars of employment and, because the claimant was an employee, made an additional award of two weeks' pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002 in the sum of £1,070 net.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Conceded at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 for unpaid holiday pay; awarded as £6,085.80 gross subject to deductions. | Upheld | — | £6,086 |
| Other | Additional award of two weeks' pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002 because the claimant was an employee and the respondent admitted failing to provide written particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,070 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,156
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.