Case 3205578/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Lukacs v AFS Dry Cleaning Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205578/2022
- Decision date
- 24 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Lukacs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss A Lukacs, brought a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages against AFS Dry Cleaning Ltd. The hearing took place at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 24 April 2023 before Employment Judge B Beyzade. The respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of arrears of pay between 03 September 2022 and 16 September 2022 was well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £263.96 gross, with any required tax and national insurance deductions to be made and remitted to HMRC if the respondent intimated such deductions in writing to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint concerned arrears of pay between 03 September 2022 and 16 September 2022. The tribunal ordered payment of £263.96 gross, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance if required. | Upheld | — | £264 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £264
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.