Case 3205586/2021 · Employment Tribunal

XY v Respondent — 2023

Case reference: 3205586/2021
Decision date: 8 March 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Russell Representation
Venue: East London Hearing Centre

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the hearing at East London on 6 March 2023, Employment Judge Russell dealt with the respondent's application for costs against the claimant. The tribunal refused that application.

The judgment also records that the restricted reporting order made on 5 May 2022 under rules 50(1) and 29 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and section 11(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 was made permanent in respect of the respondent. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The respondent's application for costs to be paid by the claimant was refused.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	The restricted reporting order made on 5 May 2022 was made permanent in respect of the respondent.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.