Case 3205595/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Schembri v Top Meadow Golf Centre Ltd t/a Top Meadow Golf Club — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205595/2021
- Decision date
- 27 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elgot Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Schembri
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter came before Employment Judge Elgot at a preliminary hearing on 19 May 2022. None of the parties attended or were represented. The tribunal was told by ACAS that the case had been settled on 15 February 2022 and that a COT3 had been signed, and this was confirmed by an email from the claimant's former representative sent on the day of the hearing.
The judge noted that there was no formal settlement notification on the tribunal file, but said there was no doubt that the case had been the subject of a proper settlement agreement. On that basis, and pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal dismissed all the claims in the case on 27 May 2022. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not set out the substantive head in the body text; this claim is inferred from the GOV.UK listing category. The tribunal dismissed all claims after being told the case had settled and a COT3 had been signed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | This is inferred from the GOV.UK listing category 'Health & Safety'; the judgment itself does not identify the precise legal label. The tribunal dismissed all claims after accepting that the matter had been settled by COT3. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers only to 'all the claims' and does not separately analyse this head. It was dismissed following the reported settlement and COT3. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers only to 'all the claims' and does not separately analyse this head. It was dismissed following the reported settlement and COT3. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.