Case 3205596/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Crossbreed Records Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205596/2022
- Decision date
- 9 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary judgment, not a merits decision. Employment Judge Reid held that the claimant was a worker of Crossbreed Records Limited within s230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 and s83(2) Equality Act 2010 on each occasion when he worked at a respondent event. On that basis, the tribunal said it had jurisdiction to hear the claimant’s claims.
The judgment also records that a temporary restricted reporting order made under s11 Employment Tribunals Act 1996 remained in place until the next preliminary hearing. No substantive liability issue or remedy was determined in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary jurisdiction finding only. The tribunal held that the claimant was a worker of the respondent within s230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 and s83(2) Equality Act 2010 on each occasion when he worked at a respondent event, which meant it had jurisdiction to hear the claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.