Case 3205651/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Strutt v Watership Downs Nursery CIC Heard East London Hearing Centre (By CVP) on 17 July 2023 — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205651/2022
- Decision date
- 17 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Burns Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Strutt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard evidence on oath from Ms M Strutt and Ms Kennedy and was referred to documentary folders from each side. There was a dispute about the number of hours the claimant had worked in the year up to her resignation. The tribunal preferred the claimant's evidence, which it said appeared to be based on detailed records that Ms Kennedy had not engaged with, despite receiving them on 31/5/23. The tribunal also noted an admitted history of some minor underpayments and that the claimant's complaint about underpayment had been made during employment, not only afterwards.
On the notice pay claim, the tribunal disallowed one week for 31/10 and 1/11/22 because the claimant did not work those days and had not provided a sick note to cover the absence. It allowed the remaining notice pay claimed, namely £114 for 24 and 25/10/22, because the claimant was on paid holiday that week but her contractual entitlement to normal pay was not extinguished by holiday pay; the tribunal described the entitlement as cumulative and not alternative.
Having accepted the claimant's figures on the disputed hours, the tribunal found that £59.49 holiday pay and £57 unpaid salary were due. The total sum awarded was £230.49, ordered to be paid by 31/7/23.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal allowed £114 of the notice pay claim, but disallowed one week from the claim for 31/10 and 1/11/22 because the claimant did not work those days and did not provide a sick note to cover that absence. | Upheld | — | £114 |
| Holiday pay | On the claimant's accepted figures, the tribunal found holiday pay of £59.49 due. | Upheld | — | £59 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | On the claimant's accepted figures, the tribunal found unpaid salary of £57 due. | Upheld | — | £57 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £230
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.