Case 3205673/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Alvarez v The Outlet Tea Rooms (Burstead) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205673/2021
- Decision date
- 24 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Alvarez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that neither Mr A Alvarez nor The Outlet Tea Rooms (Burstead) Ltd attended the full merits hearing by telephone listed for 21 March 2022 at 12pm. It was satisfied that both parties had received notice of the hearing by correspondence dated 20 October 2021, 10 November 2021, and 17 February 2022.
Because neither party had been in contact with the tribunal to indicate whether they would attend, the tribunal decided to strike out the claim on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not make findings on the substantive merits of the underlying claim.
This was a case management disposal only. No monetary award was made and no remedy was assessed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim because neither party attended the full merits hearing listed for 21 March 2022, and it was not actively pursued. The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the wages claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.