Case 3205680/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Mathurin-Russell v Kone Corporation and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205680/2021
- Decision date
- 23 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr O Mathurin-Russell
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint in this judgment. It recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal claim, and found that Mr O Mathurin-Russell had been employed for less than two years.
Because the claimant did not satisfy the qualifying service requirement, the tribunal held that he was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The reasons also state that he was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but he did not give an acceptable reason.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was therefore struck out. The judgment adds that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was struck out under section 108 ERA 1996 because the claimant had less than two years' service and was therefore not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.