Case 3205721/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Andersone v Touba Distribution Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205721/2021
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Andersone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Jones issued a Rule 21 judgment on 11 January 2022 in favour of Ms E Andersone against Touba Distribution Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages, identifying unpaid sums of £737 for April 2021 and £787 for May 2021, and ordered repayment of £1,524.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It awarded £692.31 for 8 days of accrued and untaken leave during employment.
A further finding was that the respondent failed to give one week’s notice of termination of employment. The judgment records the claimant’s entitlement to one week’s pay, calculated in the text as £432.69, and orders £432.00. The total ordered by the tribunal was £2,648.31.
The hearing listed for 18 March 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sums for April 2021 (£737) and May 2021 (£787), totalling £1,524. | Upheld | — | £1,524 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £692.31 for 8 days of accrued and untaken leave during employment. | Upheld | — | £692 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give one week’s notice of termination and ordered one week’s pay. The text records the calculation as £1,875 x 12/52 = £432.69, but the sum ordered is £432.00. | Upheld | — | £432 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,648
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.