Case 3205728/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gleb Pantsuk v N & D Aquatics — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205728/2022
- Decision date
- 12 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Mack Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gleb Pantsuk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal first addressed the unpaid holiday pay claim. It held that the date on which payment of holiday pay should have been made was 25 August 2022, and on that basis found the holiday pay claim was in time. The extracted judgment does not record any merits finding or monetary award on that claim.
The tribunal then considered the race discrimination claim. It found that the latest act to which the discrimination complaint related was 29 July 2022, so the claim was out of time. It further held that there was no period for which it would be just and equitable to extend time, and it therefore dismissed the race discrimination claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the date on which payment of holiday pay should have been made was 25 August 2022, so the holiday pay claim was in time. The extracted judgment does not record a merits decision or award on this claim. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal found that the latest act to which the discrimination claim related was 29 July 2022. It held the claim was out of time, found there was no period for which it would be just and equitable to extend time, and dismissed the race discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.