Case 3205765/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Halloran v North East London NHS Foundation Trust CLOSED PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205765/2022
- Decision date
- 2 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Halloran
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a closed preliminary hearing on 2 August 2023 before Employment Judge Shore, the claimant did not appear. The respondent was represented by Mr A Hazelwood, solicitor. The judgment records that the hearing was held in public by CVP at East London Hearing Centre.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not list individual causes of action, but the case listing identifies disability discrimination as one of the claims. It was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not list individual causes of action, but the case listing identifies public interest disclosure as one of the claims. It was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not list individual causes of action, but the case listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the claims. It was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.