Case 3205773/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Razc v Kasko Parts Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205773/2022
- Decision date
- 25 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Razc
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Razc presented claims on 2 December 2022 for unlawful deduction of wages, pleaded as non-payment of minimum wages, overtime and holiday pay, together with claims for failure to provide a statement of terms of employment and failure to provide itemised pay statements. The final hearing was listed for 25 May 2023 at East London Hearing Centre by CVP before Employment Judge B Beyzade.
The claimant did not attend the hearing and did not respond to the tribunal's attempts to contact him by telephone and email on the morning of the hearing. The tribunal waited until 11.42am, after the listed start time, before dealing with the respondent's application.
Applying Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure and taking account of the overriding objective in Rule 2, the tribunal dismissed the claim because of the claimant's non-attendance. No evidence was heard and the judgment records no findings on the merits of any of the pleaded claims and no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Pleaded as non-payment of minimum wages, overtime and holiday pay. Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend, so there was no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Pleaded as failure to provide a statement of terms of employment. Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend, so there was no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Pleaded as failure to provide itemised pay statements. Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend, so there was no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.