Case 3205781/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Ban Ibrahim v A1 Pharmaceuticals plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205781/2022
- Decision date
- 28 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Michell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Ban Ibrahim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 28 April 2023, Employment Judge P Michell sat alone by CVP to hear Ms Ban Ibrahim's claim against A1 Pharmaceuticals Plc. The written judgment dismisses her unfair constructive dismissal claim and her separate claims for notice pay, arrears of pay, other payments and breach of confidentiality.
The extract records no monetary award and no separate remedy findings. On the text provided, all claims were dismissed and no payment was ordered.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment refers to this as a claim of unfair constructive dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this as a claim for notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this as a claim for arrears of pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this as a claim for 'other payments'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this as a claim for 'breach of confidentiality'. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.