Mr A Babb v Orange Twist Limited — 2022

Case reference: 3205901/2021
Decision date: 24 June 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Moor Representation

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Babb

Respondent

Orange Twist Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found that Mr A Babb was unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure. The judgment records that the hearing was held in public by video at East London Hearing Centre on 23 June 2022 before Employment Judge Moor.

The respondent, Orange Twist Limited, was ordered to pay Mr Babb £2,484.00. The award was calculated as 12 weeks' pay at an average of £207 per week, and the judgment states that recoupment does not apply.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure.	Upheld	—	£2,484

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £2,484; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.