Case 3205930/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Stubbs v BCA Logistics Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205930/2021
- Decision date
- 11 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Stubbs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 11 February 2022, Regional Employment Judge Taylor heard the respondent's application to strike out Mr N Stubbs's claim against BCA Logistics Ltd. The judgment states that the application succeeded and that the claim was struck out.
The tribunal gave two reasons for striking out the claim: first, that the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted by the claimant was scandalous, unreasonable and vexatious; and second, that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. No separate liability findings or remedy awards are recorded in the extracted judgment.
The judgment text does not set out the underlying pleaded causes of action, and it does not record any compensatory or other monetary award. The only outcome recorded is strike out of the claim in its entirety.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not itemise individual heads of claim. It records that the claim as a whole was struck out on the respondent's application because the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted by the claimant was scandalous, unreasonable and vexatious, and because the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.