Case 3205958/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Adeyinka v Spencer and Arlington Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3205958/2022
- Decision date
- 6 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr R Blanco, Mr P Lush
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Adeyinka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 3, 4 and 5 December 2024, before Employment Judge Crosfill and members Mr R Blanco and Mr P Lush, the tribunal heard Mr B Adeyinka’s claims against Spencer and Arlington Limited. The short written judgment records that the claimant’s direct discrimination claims under sections 9, 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 did not succeed and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written judgment records this as a direct discrimination claim under sections 9, 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010. The case listing identifies the discrimination category as race discrimination, but the short written record does not set out the factual basis. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records a victimisation claim under sections 27 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.