Case 3205959/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Courtney Peggs v Little Leaps Daycare Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205959/2022
- Decision date
- 9 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hay Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Courtney Peggs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Courtney Peggs, did not attend the hearing. The Respondent was represented by Ms Clayton of Counsel, instructed by DAS Law, and Mr Hussain, consultant for Croner. The case was heard at East London Hearing Centre via CVP on 8 June 2023 before Employment Judge Hay sitting alone. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The Tribunal rejected the Claimant’s claim dated 12 December 2022 under rule 12 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, schedule 1. The basis for rejection was that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the claim because it had been brought out of time. No substantive liability findings or remedy awards were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim dated 12 December 2022 was rejected under rule 12 because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it as it was brought out of time. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.