Case 3205963/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ganesh Kumar Jasti v Mr Marchin Adam Matuszak — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205963/2021
- Decision date
- 13 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ganesh Kumar Jasti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Burgher heard the case remotely by telephone on 11 April 2022. The respondent was identified as a director of Mamino Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr Ganesh Kumar Jasti, was employed by Mamino Ltd and not by the respondent.
The tribunal noted that the claimant already had an Employment Tribunal judgment in his favour against Mamino Ltd. On that basis, the tribunal found that the claims brought against Mr Marchin Adam Matuszak could not succeed because he was not the claimant's employer.
The judgment therefore dismissed the claims against the respondent. No monetary award or other remedy was made in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the text provided. The tribunal dismissed the claims against the respondent because the claimant was employed by Mamino Ltd and not by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.