Case 3205996/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Mauteen Davies-Jones v Morgarten Restaurants Lakeside Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205996/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Mauteen Davies-Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs Mauteen Davies-Jones, brought a complaint in respect of unauthorised deduction from wages against Morgarten Restaurants Lakeside Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation). The respondent did not attend and entered no response. Employment Judge A M Buchanan sat alone at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 18 May 2023.
The tribunal found the wage complaint well-founded. It held that £802.70 was unpaid wages due to the claimant for the month of her employment that ended on 14 September 2022, and that the sum should have been paid on 6 October 2022.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £802.70 forthwith. It recorded that the payment was gross and that the claimant was to account to the appropriate authorities for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due on receipt. The total sum due from the respondent was £802.70.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described the claim as a complaint in respect of unauthorised deduction from wages and found it well-founded. It ordered payment of £802.70 gross, being unpaid wages for the month of employment ending on 14 September 2022, due to have been paid on 6 October 2022. | Upheld | — | £803 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £803
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.