Case 3206042/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Olesia Zemaitiene v Ocean Fleet Seafood Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3206042/2021
- Decision date
- 10 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Garsed Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Olesia Zemaitiene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Olesia Zemaitiene brought a claim against Ocean Fleet Seafood Ltd. The hearing took place at East London Hearing Centre on 9 March 2022 before Employment Judge Garsed, with no attendance for the Respondent and representation for the Claimant by Jonathan West, Solicitor.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed by the Respondent and that her unfair dismissal claim succeeded. No separate legal test or detailed reasons are set out in the extracted judgment text.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £8,698 net in remedy. The judgment does not break that figure down into separate components such as basic award or compensatory award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed and that the unfair dismissal claim succeeds. It then orders the Respondent to pay £8,698 net in remedy, but does not break that sum down into separate heads of loss. | Upheld | — | £8,698 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,698
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.