Case 3206211/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Hagele v Railway Café SOS Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3206211/2021
- Decision date
- 23 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett Members
- Panel members
- Ms A Berry, Mr P Lowe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Hagele
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs L Hagele brought claims against Railway Café SOS Limited. At the liability stage, the tribunal at East London Hearing Centre (via CVP) on 11 and 12 August 2022 found that her automatic unfair dismissal claim under s99 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and succeeded.
The tribunal also found that her claim of unlawful discrimination under s18 Equality Act 2010 was well founded and succeeded. On the wording used in the judgment, this is the tribunal's only stated discrimination finding in the extracted text, and it is recorded as a succeeded claim without further factual particulars in the excerpt provided.
In addition, the tribunal upheld the Claimant's claim for breach of contract, limited to notice pay, and her claim for payment in lieu of holiday accrued but not taken at the date of termination. The judgment does not record a final monetary award in the extracted text.
The tribunal listed a remedy hearing for 3 October 2022, so the liability judgment was not the final disposal of compensation. The extracted text contains no remedy figures, split awards, or findings on costs.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal under s99 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the Claimant's claim of unlawful discrimination under s18 Equality Act 2010 was well founded and succeeded. The excerpt does not give further particulars of the discriminatory act. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the Claimant's claim for breach of contract, limited to notice pay, was well founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the Claimant's claim for payment in lieu of holiday accrued but not taken at termination was well founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s99 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s18 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.