Case 3206275/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Theresa Salmon v London Borough of Newham — 2024
- Case reference
- 3206275/2021
- Decision date
- 26 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Members
- Panel members
- Mrs S Jeary, Mrs S Dengate
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Theresa Salmon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case at East London Hearing Centre by CVP over 20, 21 and 22 September 2023 and 24, 25 and 26 January 2024. The panel was Employment Judge Byrne with members Mrs S Jeary and Mrs S Dengate.
The unanimous judgment was that Mrs Salmon's constructive dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. The Tribunal also dismissed the disability discrimination reasonable adjustments claim, finding it was not well-founded.
The judgment extract records only the final outcomes and does not set out detailed factual findings, legal reasoning, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claim for constructive dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment identifies this as a disability discrimination reasonable adjustments claim and states that it was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.