Case 3206320/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Alcock v Enjay Imports Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3206320/2021
- Decision date
- 5 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Alcock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal first dealt with limitation. It found the claim was not presented within the relevant time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. On that basis, the Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to consider the listed complaints.
The complaints within jurisdiction were unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unlawful deduction of wages, failure to pay holiday pay, and failure to provide written terms and conditions of employment. The Tribunal said those claims were well-founded and that the claimant succeeded in his complaints.
The judgment records that the claimant was entitled to a remedy for the successful complaints, but it does not set out any monetary award. It states that a separate remedy judgment would be issued.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal said it had jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal complaint and held that the claim was well-founded. No separate remedy was set out in this judgment; a remedy judgment was to follow. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal listed breach of contract among the complaints within jurisdiction and found the claim well-founded. No separate remedy was set out in this judgment; a remedy judgment was to follow. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal listed unlawful deduction of wages among the complaints within jurisdiction and found the claim well-founded. No separate remedy was set out in this judgment; a remedy judgment was to follow. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal listed failure to pay holiday pay among the complaints within jurisdiction and found the claim well-founded. No separate remedy was set out in this judgment; a remedy judgment was to follow. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | This corresponds to the listed complaint for failure to provide written terms and conditions of employment, which the Tribunal held was well-founded. No separate remedy was set out in this judgment; a remedy judgment was to follow. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- further reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.