Case 3206347/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Farrow v C & W Fencing Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3206347/2021
- Decision date
- 26 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Farrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Farrow brought claims against C & W Fencing Limited for unfair dismissal, breach of contract and a redundancy payment. The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims were not presented in time, and that it was reasonably practicable for them to have been presented in time, so both claims were dismissed on limitation grounds.
The tribunal also found that the redundancy payment claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. No compensation or other monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because it was not presented in time, and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because it was not presented in time, and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable to do so
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.