Mr M J Miah v Uber London Limited — 2022

Case reference: 3206616/2021
Decision date: 18 March 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Russell Representation
Venue: East London Hearing Centre

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M J Miah

Respondent

Uber London Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal held that all of the claimant's claims had been presented out of time.

It found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented within the applicable time limits, and/or that they had not been presented within a reasonable time thereafter.

On that basis, the tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the claims and struck out all claims.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that all claims were presented out of time and were struck out for lack of jurisdiction. The specific claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than named in the judgment text.	Struck out	—	—
Working time regulations	The judgment states that all claims were presented out of time and were struck out for lack of jurisdiction. The specific claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than named in the judgment text.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.