Case 3206622/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Denegri v Seine Investments Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3206622/2021
- Decision date
- 16 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Denegri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that there had been a relevant transfer of undertaking between Cabot Developments Limited and Seine Investments Limited on 27 August 2016. On that basis, it accepted the claim for a redundancy payment based on 10 complete years of service and ordered the respondent to pay a further £2,668.28, in addition to what had already been paid.
The breach of contract claim also succeeded. The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to 10 weeks' notice of termination but had only been given 4 weeks' notice. It ordered a further £1,779.19, in addition to sums already paid amounting to 5 weeks' pay less 34p.
The claim for unpaid wages was dismissed upon withdrawal because the respondent had already paid the sums claimed. The tribunal also found a breach of the duty under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide a written statement of employment particulars, and said it was just and equitable to award 4 weeks' pay under section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002. That award was £1,423.08, bringing the total further sum payable to £5,870.55.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claim for a redundancy payment based on 10 complete years of service was well-founded. It ordered a further £2,668.28 in addition to the sum already paid. | Upheld | — | £2,668 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant had been given 4 weeks' notice of termination instead of the 10 weeks to which she was entitled. It ordered a further £1,779.19, in addition to sums already paid amounting to 5 weeks' pay less 34p. | Upheld | — | £1,779 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unpaid wages was dismissed upon withdrawal because the respondent had already paid the sums claimed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal held the respondent was in breach of its duty under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to give a written statement of employment particulars. It awarded 4 weeks' pay under section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,423 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,871
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38(3) Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.