Case 3206769/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Hahn v South West Essex Community Education Trust Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3206769/2021
- Decision date
- 8 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Allen Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Hahn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs K Hahn brought claims against South West Essex Community Education Trust Limited for unfair dismissal and several disability discrimination claims. The case was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 5-8 September 2023 before Employment Judge F Allen, with both parties represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. It also dismissed the claim of direct discrimination on the grounds of disability, the claim of discrimination arising from disability, and the claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments. The judgment does not record any remedy award or apportionment between claims.
No further reasoning, findings of fact, or legal tests are set out in the extracted text provided beyond the formal dismissal of each claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records a claim of direct discrimination on the grounds of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Other | The judgment records a claim of discrimination arising from disability; this claim type is not separately listed in the locked taxonomy. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Other | The judgment records a claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments; this claim type is not separately listed in the locked taxonomy. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.